Donald Trump just imposed a 25 percent tariff on virtually all goods produced by America’s two largest trading partners — Canada and Mexico. He simultaneously established a 20 percent across-the-board tariff on Chinese goods.

As a result, America’s average tariff level is now higher than at any time since the 1940s.

Meanwhile, China and Canada immediately retaliated against Trump’s duties, with the former imposing a 15 percent tariff on American agricultural products and the latter putting a 25 percent tariff on $30 billion of US goods. Mexico has vowed to mount retaliatory tariffs of its own.

This trade war could have far-reaching consequences. Trump’s tariffs have already triggered a stock market sell-off and cooling of manufacturing activity. And economists have estimated that the trade policy will cost the typical US household more than $1,200 a year, as the prices of myriad goods rise.

All this raises the question: Why has the US president chosen to upend trade relations on the North American continent? The stakes of this question are high, since it could determine how long Trump’s massive tariffs remain in effect. Unfortunately, the president himself does not seem to know the answer.

In recent weeks, Trump has provided five different — and contradictory — justifications for his tariffs on Mexico and Canada…

…more in the article.

    • socialjusticewizard@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      79
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      yup. it’s successfully costing america its allies.

      It’s not inappropriate though. I’ve been saying for years Canada should not be so closely allied with such a fickle country.

  • Today@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Apparently It’s supposed to get rid of the browns and the gays and the women and everyone else until it’s just a bunch of old white men sitting around, counting money, and masturbating to AI porn? Kind of like a hateful gross version of Scrooge McDuck.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      5 months ago

      It seems to be working, I signed my ticket out of here. I’m a brown and queer woman. Just need to survive until immigration goes through.

      • ramble81@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        5 months ago

        If you don’t mind, how are you pulling it off? Just trying to get ideas too.

        • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          5 months ago

          Work transfer through my day job. I will note I’m taking a 50% pay cut for this, but the mental security and new friends will be worth it

    • otto@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Scrooge McDuck was also pretty awful. They had to invent a nemesis for him, Flintheart Glumgold, just to make him not seem so bad by comparison.

    • Hubi@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 months ago

      Funny, isn’t that the exact amount of the stimulus checks he handed out during his first presidency?

    • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      off topic, but what does your signature mean? can you really copyright your comments? I’ve never seen this before

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s the equivalent of those Facebook posts you see telling Zuck that you don’t consent to your data being stored and sold.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        can you really copyright your comments?

        By default, everything you write, from a novel to an Internet forum shitpost, is not only copyrighted by you but also “all rights reserved.”

        What that guy is doing is (a) making his writings more available for reuse than they would be otherwise, and (b) making a point about how fucked-up it is that corporations treat stuff posted to social media as if it were a free-for-all they could use however they want.

            • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              all due respect, but you are not a news entity and you will never know whether your license was honored, so i really don’t see the point. but like i said, you do you

              • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                all due respect, but you are not a news entity and you will never know whether your license was honored, so i really don’t see the point. but like i said, you do you

                The point is to have protection for my content. I have the same rights under the law as ANYBODY ELSE. All are capable of licensing their content on social sites that protects themselves with Safe Harbor laws.

                As far as enforcement goes, that is not my job. If a law is not enforced doesn’t mean I don’t try to avail myself of the protections under the law. I don’t constantly audit my local police force to be sure that they are enforcing laws.

                I want my content to be available and used by open-source organizations, and I signal that via my license. Otherwise the default licensing (show nothing) does not allow them to do so.

                Finally, is it really worth your time (and all other citizens) to nag/harrass someone away from using the same laws that Corporations use to their benefit? I mean I point to an “Ask Lemmy” post often (here, let me do it again) where this has been hashed out already. You’re not saying anything new. But it seems like every individual still wants to recreate the conversation again, and again, and again, for SOME strange reason.

                This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

                • cheers_queers@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  maybe if everyone is telling you the same thing, it’s not us that’s wrong? food for thought.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s chicken change if you make, say, $80K+. Significant if you make, say, $20K. (Thinking about individuals, not households, adjust accordingly. And COL is a huge thing depending.)

      In any case, I’d take that number with a bucket of salt. Can’t see any way that number was calculated meaningfully this early in the game.

  • notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    ·
    5 months ago

    All this raises the question: Why has the US president chosen to upend trade relations on the North American continent?

    It’s because the trade agreement trump’s unhappy with was made by a raging moron.

    • thejml@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      5 months ago

      For everyone else following along, the USMCA that was put in place after Trump renegotiated NAFTA in his first term… was made by Trump. So he’s unhappy with his own legacy. Which seems on brand for him, tbh.

      • ryper@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Part of the agreement allows for a review next year and his complaints could have been addressed them, but apparently negotiated such a lousy deal he can’t wait that long.

        • SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          5 months ago

          They are tanking markets for both the fire sale bargains and to hurt the poor more, so they can direct the resulting anger towards projects like territorial expansion and government privatization.

          • YonderEpochs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            5 months ago

            Thank you. Stated goals and actual goals for these people are always entirely independent, if they align it’s just coincidence / convenience. People need to stop being so credible and debating this shit on its stated terms, fascists don’t debate in good faith.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The secret ingredient is crime. The casinos were fronts for money laundering and “failed” on purpose as part of the scam.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      It’s also because the rest of the people in charge (mainly Republicans) aren’t doing anything to stop them. It also has to do with Americans being largely stupid.

      Most republicans aren’t going to do anything because if they go against Trump … Trump will skewer them and they’ll lose their seat because their voters are stupid too.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Just my opinion as a layman: the tariffs give his corporate backers all the excuse they need to jack up prices even higher.

    • YonderEpochs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      5 months ago

      That, plus it seems very likely that he and friends are just manipulating the market to trade on the predictable moves he’s causing. Ya know, the kinda stuff that earned Musk some mild hand slaps and theatrical pearl clutching (in addition to giant financial benefits) in recent years.

    • Manos_in_lemmy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Agree, inflation can theoretically increase not only prices, but wages to compensate the increased cost of living, therefore appear as a boomed GDP, bringing the debt to GDP ratio lower without actually reducing debt. Eu, china, Russia all have much lower debt to GDP. Of course in reality inflation is hard to manage once it gets out of hand, and the levels of interest rates don’t give enough space for corrections, and the problem of inflation being the reduced consumption leading to a lesser increase of GDP.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        GDP is always calculated in nominal and real (inflation adjusted) GDP.

        Inflation does not reduce debt to GDP by increasing the perceived GDP, but by devalueing the debt owned, as it is a fixed sum with usually interest rates fixed for a certain time

  • Sundray@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    5 months ago

    He had the idea to raise tariffs, and he believes all his ideas are really good, so he followed his own good advice and raised tariffs, dead simple.

  • Yodan@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because his only job now is to sign any papers handed to him by his posse of self enriching gremlins. He doesn’t need anyone’s vote anymore, he doesn’t need anyone’s money (except if it starts with a B) and doesn’t care anymore because he will likely die in office. If he signs horrible shit billionaires around him want, then he gets to coast as president, no thinking involved. This is what he is doing.

  • Lit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    5 months ago

    Market manipulation. He is also a TV show host, so he is a showman. He likes creating drama.

    He is famous for bad management, causing his casinos to go bankrupt. His management style is going to bankrupt US and somehow make him richer.

    • P1nkman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why can’t we make him unalive? He wouldn’t be able to play with WWIII that way…

      • Lit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Or just watch him bankrupt USA just like his casino, I think US need to go through that pain to realize why they should not vote for a showman, TV show host again.

        Sun Tzu: “Never interrupt your opponent while he is in the middle of making a mistake.”

    • Mangoholic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Actually in his previous presidency he managed to lose personal wealth rather than increase it. He is so incompetent he can’t even enrich himself with 4 years of being president lol.

  • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Market manipulation … upset the system … make it dive … buy cheap … sell them high

    Keep doing this for the next four years until you become king of the world!

      • imvii@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because Trump is going to buckle on the tariffs. He will come up with some reason they aren’t needed, or they’re severely reduced, and he pretends he’s the hero in the story.

        The MAGA will lick his anus and everyone else will be like “Dafuq old man?”

      • Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Because hundreds of millions of people believe him and corporations bow to him and expect favour.

  • sasquatch7704@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I know why he did it. Because that’s what his best best friend from Kremlin said and his two last working brain cells are in vacation playing golf.

    He probably doesn’t understand that if US stops all trading, will become just a bigger North Korea with nukes.

  • PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s part of their plan to eliminate the IRS and federal taxation, to be replaced by a universal sales tax. However, trump doesn’t have the authority to do that. But he can tariff. And a tariff is a little bit like a sales tax.

    Therefore, we get tariffs.

    Now, the other problem is that the tariff revenue is going to be like 1/10 that of the IRS tax revenue, which will require a 90% reduction in federal spending. Including defense, research, healthcare, and social security. Can’t collect social security tax if the IRS doesn’t exist either, so social security is getting axed.

    It will of course make 56 million seniors homeless, but thats a small price to pay for a 15% pay bump for me!

  • turnip@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Look at the Project 2025 document, its supposedly written by the heritage foundation but has a section on building a border wall and doing capital punishment. Its clearly crafted by Trump.

    Inside it talks about tariffs, using them to force other countries to lower their tariffs against the US. I assume its meant to force a free trade agreement that is 100% free trade, and not a misnomer like it is now, he wants the massive shock so that country are entirely submissive.

    • nectar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 months ago

      You think trump is capable of not just coming up with the worst political takes known to man, but also is even aware of that much policy?

      I think you give him way more credit than he deserves

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      Seems like it’s not going according to plan then huh. US opponents are anything but submissive right now. I don’t think US has the capacity for a long game.

  • TimeChild@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 months ago

    The big corps can weather the storm, smalls will have to sell, consolidate and monopolize is the plan as I see it