• artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    You can’t make an “affordable” electric SUV. The vast majority of the cost of any EV is in the battery. Giving it a giant frontal area means it’s inherently inefficient and the only way to make up for that it by putting more battery in it, which jacks up the price.

    Give us more small electric sedans, coupes, hatchbacks, etc.

    • boaratio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I worked at a major battery company for 11 years. You’re wrong. If you produce them in enough volume they’re practically free. Less than the cost of an internal combustion engine. I’m not a Tesla fan, but their entire cost model is built on mass producing 18650 batteries.

      Transporting refined fossil fuels from countries half way around the world is way less efficient and costly. Electric vehicles aren’t going to defeat climate change, but I’m so sick of hearing pushback against them. They’re at least better than ICE vehicles because batteries are 100% recyclable, and the electricity used to charge them can come from renewable sources.

      Roll coal in your illegally modified truck all you want, but this is the future.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        If you produce them in enough volume they’re practically free.

        What are you talking about? They’re absolutely not.

        Transporting refined fossil fuels from countries half way around the world is way less efficient and costly.

        No one is talking about fossil fuels?

        Electric vehicles aren’t going to defeat climate change, but I’m so sick of hearing pushback against them.

        Roll coal in your illegally modified truck all you want

        I think you may have replied to the wrong comment. I did not “push back against electric vehicles”, I advocated for smaller, more affordable ones.

        • boaratio@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Thanks to your reply, I’m leaving Lemmy. This is such an insular doomsaying community that can’t hear anything that conflicts with their world view. I came here as a reddit refugee when Spez decided he liked money more than anything, but I’m not going to be berated by people with closed minds. Have a nice life.

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Haven’t heard of that before but yeah, kinda. Although it’s more about aerodynamics than weight.

    • Hirom@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It does look fairly big, so it’s going to be expensive as you’ve explained.

      Some places take the weight of vehicles into account to compute incentives, giving less subsidies for heavier cars. One way or another it should be factored in.

          • artyom@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            That’s awesome, you almost never see the US incentivizing small vehicles. Actually have been doing the opposite for a long time with CAFE exemptions, oil subsidies, and chicken taxes.

            • Hirom@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Yes, it’s a good change, although it’s recent. Vehicles sizes have increased everywhere, France included, because of SUVs. It’ll take time to reverse. At the same time the overall budget for EVs incentives was reduced, so it’s a mixed bag.