• 4 Posts
  • 594 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 9th, 2023

help-circle
  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.detomemes@lemmy.worldNULL
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I work in advertising, I know, it’s just that in the industry it’s pretty well known that Google, Facebook etc. hugely overinflate their numbers as they arbitrarily decide that it definitely did have an effect on you to make their systems look better


  • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.detomemes@lemmy.worldNULL
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The problem is the ones with all the data have no real use for it.

    Google, Facebook, etc. tell you they have data, sell you the ad, run the ad on their own site, then tell you how well the ad did, but not in absolute terms. All in a black box. They don’t actually have to use their data, as they’re the ones grading their own work, they can just flaunt it to get buyers onboard.






  • The $1m isn’t in cash… You forget that the average house price in London is around $900k, and for Sydney it’s $981k.

    That means your pool for your car, furnishings, investments etc. are either minimal, or you have a mortgage, and definitely can’t live passively off $30-40k per year unless you’re living in cheaper than average housing (one would call this “not super wealthy”) and definitely not if you’re supporting a family.

    I’m not saying the cost of living isn’t worse in the US, just that $1m is a comparatively tiny amount everywhere and that most millionaires (as there will a correlation between net worth and frequency) are frankly closer to the working class than they are to billionaires.


  • Most, sure, but Europe, Korea, Japan, Singapore, Australia, New Zealand and more are still a significant part of the world where $1M puts you firmly in the same “well-off and comfortable, but certainly not rich in the way billionaires are” territory you’d be in the US

    Worldwide, I think it’s definitely safe to say most millionaires’ lifestyles are much closer to average than they are to billionaires’ (ie still having to make regular payments for housing, but mortgage rather than rent, and still having to perform most tasks for themselves rather than having PAs to do it for them)





  • There’s no need to instantly hate on Christianity without further context. If you’re going to one of the cultish hate-spreading or profit-driven churches, sure, but there are also many community-focused denominations which are good to go to as a place you’ll be welcomed at a low point in your life. I don’t attend any and am not particularly religious, but I imagine if I felt truly alone and had nowhere else to turn that an Episcopal/Methodist/similar church would be quite high on the list of physical places it’d be good to go.




  • One of three:

    • People whose cultures didn’t value them/were disconnected from the original creators eg. Egypt
    • People who ran empires and were just going to destroy them for a new palace or something anyway eg. Ottomans in Greece
    • People who were forced to give them up in the face of a much stronger miltary power eg. a lot of the Chinese & Indian stuff

    I don’t think there’s anything unethical about keeping 1 and 2 as they wouldn’t exist otherwise, but 3 should be returned and replaced with other items from the collection or replicas




  • People of Color Aren’t Invited

    Many are of Asian descent—a reflection of the strong presence of Asian talent in global tech

    This is something I really have an issue with: they’re trying to paint it as a race thing when it’s a wealth/class thing.

    They’re trying to frame it like they hate anyone non-White while I’m willing to bet good money they have nobody, White or otherwise, from places like the Deep South/other poorer places in the US, and it’s just that Latin & Black people are more likely to come from less privileged backgrounds for historical reasons than White/Asian people.

    That’s not to say that racism doesn’t exist, it’s just to say that it’s definitely not the biggest factor here. Don’t buy into corporations trying to divide the working class by race, when it’s so obviously a class struggle.



  • Very good point, but oxygen is very abundant and you’ll more than likely already have oxygen generators with a level of redundancy, or be in an atmosphere with oxygen.

    Also for load balancing you could constantly be splitting water into hydrogen and oxygen, then react them back into water when you need a large amount of energy at once as an alternative to electrical batteries which degrades less over time, if heat is all you want at least.

    All I’m saying is there’s so many applications that we’re never going to get to a level of 0.