Then the person who originally responded to them wasn’t mansplaining, and used facts to contradict what they said. Then they acted like they already knew that
- 1 Post
- 277 Comments
So were you saying people called cocaine “speed” back then?
Wasn’t mansplaining, but the word you were trying to spell is mansplanation
The show you describe sounds pretty cool, but they just made the cavemen good at dancing, have big dicks, and I think they couldn’t swim. It wasn’t tasteful in the slightest
For anyone interested https://share.google/Z0ograFRwlccW3HZc
It was super racist and Nick Kroll was in it
CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.worldto A Boring Dystopia@lemmy.world•Imagine not being able to shower, because AI slop generator machines need that water!2·9 days agoThey owned the themselves
But then I would have to work until 8pm. That sounds horrible.
CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.worldto World News@lemmy.world•‘It destroyed me’: two more men accuse Christian rock star Michael Tait of sexual assaultEnglish2·15 days agoMy AuDHD brain assumed Chris was just short for Christian before I got past the word ‘star’ and also read it as Chris Rock :/
This implies he killed himself, but doesn’t 3 broken bones in his neck imply otherwise?
Okay, now your initial comment is more clear. Sorry for the confusion
It seems like you’re wanting to disagree with the person you’re replying to, but the point you made falls completely in line with what they said
CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.worldto Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•I'd never let my tongue touch a pineapple2·25 days agoReplace anchovies with pepperoni and that’s my usual order
CaptnNMorgan@lemmy.worldtoPolitical Memes@lemmy.world•New MAGA marching orders: assume the Epstein files were never a big deal2·1 month agoWhen was Epstein caught the first time? Was this after that?
When were diet pills brought up?