Humanity just can’t help but to repeat it’s atrocities while the world just watches.

For you who loves to complain about how I’m not doing what you want, yes I’ll vote 3rd party again.

That’s also a stupid idea. Don’t know what you were trying to accomplish by bringing that up.

If you have that type of problem then why are you even going to ChatGPT to begin with?

It always starts with “Protect the children!!”

Who was the one who wrote that agreement that Epstein signed? That’s the person you have beef with. And this has gone off topic. I argue that if the govt made an agreement in their plea agreement then they have to honor it. I don’t give a fuck about legality of the agreement. If they make the agreement, both parties sign it, and the judge approved it then honor it. There is nothing you can say that will change my mind.

No you are arguing just to argue.

I never said anything about “honoring handshake agreements” as the basis of our justice system and this isn’t a handshake agreement. It was literally done in a court of law.

1. Once again the defendant is NOT AT FAULT. If you want to put blame on anyone then you put it on the prosecutor. And the reason why you claim he is at fault is the literal definition for granting immunity. Immunity means you cannot be prosecuted for the crimes committed within it’s scope. If you have a problem with that then you have a problem with a lot of cases that were won because immunity was granted towards co-conspirators.

2. The govt should honor their agreement regardless of if the person is alive or dead. Would you be ok with the govt reneging on a deal if the victim died? Someone takes a plea deal and gets 15yrs, the victim dies in year 5, the govt goes back on the deal and releases the inmate. Is that ok? I bet it isn’t.

3. The deal was not clearly illegal and ONCE AGAIN THE FAULT IS WITH THE PROSECUTOR. Did the prosecutor know if the deal was illegal? The deal they made? The deal was done in federal court between the defendant, his lawyer, the prosecutor, AND approved by the fucking judge. You’re telling me that of all those legal experts involved the only one at fault is the one person who isn’t a legal expert (the defendant) and because those legal experts made an illegal deal that the defendant has to be punished for agreeing to the deal that all the legal experts drafted for him? Shut the fuck up. You’re just here to argue.

You are clearly arguing just to argue.

1. How is the defendant at fault? They didn’t make the deal, the prosecutor did. All they did was agree to the terms and kept their end of the bargain. Literally lawyers on both sides and the one who is not a lawyer is at fault?

2. AGREEING to a deal that protects one party from prosecution is the WHOLE POINT OF IMMUNITY. If the govt is known for not honoring immunity deals then no one will ever agree to them and key witnesses will be hard to come by in cases against organized crime.

3. If you make a deal THEN YOU HONOR IT! The example you gave on murder is fucking stupid. That’s clearly an illegal act. But the govt had their lawyers AND STILL MADE THE DEAL. Honor your deal.

Let me guess though. You are the type of person who goes back on their word just because you felt some type of way. Enter a contract and back out halfway through because things change?

No. Let me get you straight before you try to put words in my mouth to paint your narrative.

I am against prosecutors GOING BACK on the deals they’ve made. I don’t care if the prosecutor did something wrong ON THEIR END. They are the ones who have to make sure their side is straight. If the defendant enters an agreement with the prosecutor and fulfills their end of the agreement then the govt has to uphold their end as well. The defendant is at no fault for the prosecution’s mistake.

And before you continue to try and paint your narrative I want to be clear that I’m not siding with the govt or Epstein. IDAF, Epstein is dead. But during his first conviction a deal was made by the prosecution who represented the US Govt and that deal granted immunity to his co-conspirators which was broken by someone else who represented the US Govt.

And that is NOT the fault of Epstein. He upheld his end of the bargain and if the prosecutor did something underhanded that is not Epstein’s fault. The agreement should have been honored. Look at the Smollet and Cosby cases. But imagine if it was the way you wanted. All the prosecution has to do is break some rules on their end just so they can invalidate any deals made to the defense. Who would make deals then? They typically give immunity to secure convictions and this would make it impossible.

Then why is she sitting in Federal Prison? She was prosecuted in federal court on federal charges regarding the activity she should have had immunity on when Epstein was convicted the first time. He had a deal with the federal prosecutor in Florida that they would grant immunity to his co-conspirators. He did what he was supposed to under the deal but the New York prosecutor who convicted Maxwell decided to ignore that.

She was supposed to have immunity after Epstein’s first conviction from Florida but New York decided that they didn’t have to honor that. Why would she try again?

I would hate to see that credit union comply with the financial regulations of EVERY country.

There’s Discover and American Express if you’re in the US. I don’t know the porn policies of those companies but they are the alternatives.

Why the fuck are you even here? This woman probably went through a mental hell and here you are being insensitive to her death. At least she was someone unlike you.

The main weakness it has is from a nosey flatmate, spouse, or child in the house.

Watch out for that home grown script kiddie

Get offline. Hate is one of the emotions people use to increase click rate and engagement. Imagine being so full of hate that you’re glad that the children who died are the children of people you don’t like. And you don’t even know who those children were, you just assumed who their parents are because of their geographic location. That is what being online for too long will do to you. Do yourself a favor and unplug before you can’t go back.

The estate of a Northwestern University professor, who died by suicide last year after being investigated in a controversial federal probe, is suing the school for allegedly discriminating against her and evicting her from her lab — blaming the university, in part, for her death.

Jane Wu was a tenured faculty member in neurology, molecular biology and genetics at Northwestern’s Feinberg School of Medicine for nearly two decades. She was among hundreds of Chinese American scientists targeted by the Justice Department’s China Initiative, a Trump-era program seeking to counter theft of American intellectual property and research.

Though Wu was never charged, Northwestern reassigned her grant funding, closed her lab and forcibly admitted her to the university’s psychiatric hospital, according to a civil complaint filed June 23 in Cook County Circuit Court. The executor of Wu’s estate is her daughter.

The university’s actions were a “substantial and decisive factor in her decision to end her life,” the complaint stated.

“Anyone who reads the facts of this complaint will recognize that a great injustice was done to Jane Wu,” attorney Thomas Geoghegan said.

A spokesperson for Northwestern said the university does not comment on pending litigation.

The China Initiative was scrapped in 2022 under the Biden administration. Though more than 200 Chinese American researchers were investigated, researchers say only a few dozen were charged and subsequently convicted. Critics said the program fueled a narrative of bias and created a chilling effect among the academic community.

After Wu was identified in the probe, she was placed under an administrative investigation by the National Institutes of Health. Though she was a longtime professor, her grants were reassigned to her white male colleagues and her research team was dissolved, according to the filing.

“NU did nothing to support her nor help lift the racial stigma placed over Dr. Wu despite her obvious innocence and the enormous funding her work had brought to NU,” the complaint said.

Even when the NIH’s investigation concluded in December 2023, Wu’s grants were not returned to her, according to the lawsuit. Her lab was completely shut down by May 2024, preventing her from applying for new NIH funding. Because Wu’s research was listed as inactive, Northwestern reduced her salary.

Feeling increasingly isolated, Wu began to spiral into a deep depression and show signs of obsessive behavior, the filing said.

“NU destroyed not only Dr. Wu’s chances at NIH funding but also her research career,” the complaint said.

That same month, university and Chicago police removed Wu from her office in handcuffs. She was then admitted against her will to the psychiatric unit of Northwestern Memorial Hospital “as a means to end her active research and employment,” according to the lawsuit.

Wu died by suicide weeks later, on July 10, 2024, “with her career, her professional reputation, and her sense of personal safety shattered.” She was 60 years old.

The complaint did not specify what damages the estate seeks.

The filing said Wu became a naturalized citizen in 2000, and had spent nearly 40 years in the United States. She had won continuous NIH funding since 1996. Her work investigated the molecular biology of mRNA and neurodegeneration, seeking to fight diseases such as Alzheimer’s and ALS.

Margaret Flanagan, now an associate professor at University of Texas Health San Antonio, worked beside Wu for more than three years at the Feinberg School of Medicine. But she was more than a colleague, Flanagan said — she was a mentor and friend, with a deep passion for science and unwavering generosity.

“Her legacy is one of strength, compassion, and a relentless commitment to advancing science,” Flanagan wrote in a statement to the Tribune.

Wu was intense and thoughtful, Flanagan said, and her astute advice has stuck with her colleague years later. She often reminded Flanagan to “focus on (her) science.” Wu always centered her work around a larger mission of advancing knowledge and helping patients, Flanagan said.

The pair largely fell out of touch when Flanagan left Northwestern in 2023.

“I assumed there would be time in the future to reconnect, not knowing how short that time would be,” Flanagan wrote.

Andrea Chu, the Midwest organizing director for Asian American Advancing Justice Chicago, said that Wu’s death shows the “devastating” impact of the China Initiative. She pointed to the lack of cases brought by the Justice Department as an indication that the program was racially biased.

A 2021 investigation from the MIT Technology Review found that 148 individuals were charged, but just 40 of them had pleaded or been found guilty. Only 19 cases included violations of the Economic Espionage Act, the intended focus of the initiative.

“The toll that it took on the scientists themselves, their colleagues and also their families is innumerable,” Chu said. “This was a great source of fear.” Originally Published: July 4, 2025 at 4:00 PM CDT

Quarterly profits.

It’s a bit more than that. ICE can act outside the constitution within 100 miles of the border. We’ve really only seen this with warrantless searches but that’s gonna expand.