Jabril [none/use name]

  • 0 Posts
  • 205 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2024

help-circle


  • Yes, I’ve seen so much heinous shit come from of DSA members that I can’t say because it would dox me, but I have been surprised by the sentiments here towards DSA.

    I haven’t interacted with SM because I’ve never been a DSA member and only interacted with DSA members in organizing spaces outside DSA that their members are involved in. When it comes to caucuses like SM and B&R, it is easy to spot their terrible politics from a mile away, but with CC they posture so much to be “the good ones” that I think they are worse for being manipulative and deceitful. I wrote out the things I’ve seen them do but deleted it because it does feel like a way to get identified.

    Edit: also they are huge rojava stans


  • They do seem better from the outside but I haven’t worked with them directly. I did meet a few at a party once and one of them was arguing in favor of electoralism and using Venezuela as an example of how electoralism could work in the US to bring about socialism. I referenced this in one of the recent Mamdani struggle sessions. I liked that they were pro Venezuela but immediately thought it was a display of their lack of understanding of dialectical and historical materialism to assume that the conditions in Venezuela which lead to Chavismo were anything similar to the US











  • I said it in the last news struggle sesh on this topic but I do see a lot of people here with principled takes on the subject, which really makes the kinds of responses you are describing stand out to me. I think there is an underlying dialectic of bloom/doom (optimism/cynicism) mentality where some people just need to feel like the left is having a win and so get invested into being very hopeful and positive and that means that any critique which undermines that position is automatically “doomer.” Whereas I think many here can have a materialist take outside of this dialectic like “he is exactly what the has always been, a radlib, and he is doing nothing unexpected. There is also no reason to desire his loss because everyone else is worse and it will be good to see what happens if he wins whether he does better or worse than expected”

    The one user here who worked on the campaign and is super invested because of it is being extra which I get on some level because it’s not just an abstract thing but a personal project that dozens of hours went into which affects the place he lives. There’s a lot of reason to take it personally for him, but I think being rude and insulting out the gate isn’t doing any favors or displaying a comradely debate style. I get clapping back when someone starts it tho



  • This is the critique from leninists, he isn’t letting his alleged politics be in command - but since he isn’t a leninist why would we expect this? The critique is valid of communists but he isn’t a communist. Every Democrat and bourgeois candidate, mamdani included, says shit to get elected and usually backpedals a majority of it. He is doing what is expected but because he identifies as a democratic socialist it feels as if he should be held to a standard higher than he really deserves to be held to. I don’t think it’s fair to expect a liberal to be a communist, even if they think they are. What’s more annoying on this forum for me is the Democratic socialist members here acting like he isn’t a liberal, more so than the ML members acting like he should be a communist.