Haha that’s an acceptable typo :) Maybe it works online because it can simultaneously be ragebait and idol bait. But you are correct, the obsession especially for women for some reason with the aristocrat celebs is baffling

Superconputers to me refer to the mainfrane room sized monstrosities that are focused on stuff like calculating ballistic trajecories in the cold war

Low key ? Why would it not be good to have a trans neighbor?

Now do how many actual devs and not publishers

This is why it naked the news att all… it’s engagement. Just leave ragebait alone

In fact, anyone could

No. It’s not mature. If you play it like a sport, then being a gentleman is very important for your fun and growth both.

Astroturfing and lobbying and bribery has. It’s actually easy to not participate in burning or planet though.

I don’t var if you are American.

The oil industry is astroturfing openly.

ML has uses, cars has their uses. They’re about similar in legit use, I would say around 0.1%

Destroying the planet for no reason has been all the rage for decades now and is happening exclusively due to burning. Oil. When the planet starts to burn we all die. No other contributions matter.

That’s the joke.jpg

Ah ok that’s too bad. Super computers typically don’t have tensor cores though, and most LLM use is presumably client use on ready trained models which desktop or mobile cpus can manage now so it will be impossible to know then

I totally understand that. The pet peeve of yours, i just disagree with on a fundamental level. The data is the content, and speaking about it as if the data is the technology itself is like talking about clothes in general as being useful or not. It’s meaningless especially if you don’t know about or acknowledge the different types of apparel and their uses. It’s obviously not general knowledge but it would be like bickering about if underwear is a great idea or not, it’s totally up to the individual if they want to wear them, even if being butt naked in public is illegal. If the framework is irrelevant, then the immediate problem isn’t generative AI, especially the perfectly ethical open source models

What was the data you saw on what volume of requests to non-llm models as they relate to utility? I can’t figure out what profession have access to this kind of statistic? It would be very useful to know, thx.

A perfect example of the just completely delusional factoids and statistics that will spontaneously form in the hater’s mind. Thank you for the demonstration.

Where is your source? It sounds unbelievable

It’s like saying hard drives are bad because of what you can store on them

No, really. Deep learning and transformers etc. was discoveries that allowed for all of the above, just because corporate vc shitheads drag their musty balls in the latest boom abusing the piss out of it and making it uncool, does not mean the technology is a useless scam

You literally can

Yeah but that’s not what they meant, I think what they were saying with “true paedophiles” are people fixated by diddling kids, that don’t have money to do whatever they want.

It’m also questioning it tbh, because it’s always a power thing, fetishes revolving around forbidden topics entice in their own way and are fine with consenting adults and adequate safety, but the power and control fixations involved in forcing kids are unique ethically.

They’re onto something about the ultra-rich that I was trying to understand and discuss that it seems like a disproportionate amount take the chance to fuck a minor like groupes or Epstein and I don’t think I could live with something like that or even be near someone that would.

Money and fame does strange things with people is my only idea for an answer

If you did, would you then know why they are sending weapons to Israel?