No arrest for the city planners who knowingly ignored accounting for pedestrians. Hm, shocked.

Yes,they all do, but there is a pattern to what it hallucintes the most and such. So some thing are more reliable than others.

I always ignore power savings requests. If they really can’t serve the population, they need to make more power. If we all turn down our usage to make it work, they won’t make more.

Also, the restaurant probably has no control over those numbers. The software might give them a Yes/No option on showing suggested tips or not at best.

What about everyone buy a share of thier stock. Then sue thier board for ignoring thier fiduciary duty to the shareholders. Turning down business is bad for revenue… and the games that got removed probably made decent money all together.

I’m not sure it actually is. No law against it. It’s a huge flaw in the system that the people elected also decide how the election works.

When the stakes are high, attempting to push every line is expected. Some say “if you aren’t cheating, are you even trying?”

This system will simply never be fair. It needs to be replaced.

This is why I am thinking AI should be good for this. A lot of news is AI generated now, and specifically instructed to insert fluff.

https://imgur.com/a/IuwlCSf

Very true on technical stuff. It adds features to software that don’t exist, but should. But it should be better at reading language.

Clickbait headlines is one of the things I am tired of. I was hoping for something that could generate honest headlines for starters.

AIs aren’t going anywhere. Most of the news is written by AI anyway. So what better to read the news and convert it back to the raw information the author gave it.

I find the titles are often intentionally misleading to get clicks, I am trying to avoid that.

I’m not says I won’t read anything longer than a single sentence. Just that lots of current events can be boiled down to a short summary. A sentence should tell me the topic, if I care about that topic, I can read the summary. And if it is complex and interesting, I can read the article. But when the headlines are designed to be misleading, I waste a lot of time finding out that it isn’t really about what it claims to be.

Timewise. I want to spend more time reading information on subjects I care about. But I also want to stay lightly informed on other subject that I might care about in the future.

That is an impressive amount of assumptions and conjecture. All of which is incorrect. Why did you even post if not to help with a suggestion?

I’m not actually sure what this is intended to mean in this context.

Fraud, I believe, has a narrower definition than most of us think.

I believe, though I could be wrong, that for a person to be penalized for fraud, someone has to have suffer damages.

I think it should be illegal to simply mislead for financial gain. Think ads that intentionally exaggerate thier products, influencers who will claim to love some product and use it all the time, when they have never even tried it. And media that puts such a heavy spin on things that in court they claim that no reasonable person would have believed what they are saying as a defense.

Feels kinda unconstitutional to me. They could say you can’t sell it for consumption, but not sell it at all seems like an overstep.

ONLY 120 pages. I’ve seen my file, those are rookie numbers.

Meh… this is technically the right thing to do. First, it only applies in Texas. Second, right or wrong, it seems leaving thier posts when ordered back is “technically” illegal, again, only in texas for them. Paying someone to break the law is usually illegal. I am only a little fuzzy of if there is a real texas law about them needing to come back when ordered. It’s been hard to tell if that is a law or a “rule” of the state congress.