Yeah, something tells me that’s gonna need a persistent internet connection.

That’s a bit too humane for tankies. I’d rather expect „she’s a bitch and deserves to die” from the get go.

Probably tongue.

Yeah, had to dive in myself.

The answer is no, they can’t. You need to pass /dev/kvm and /dev/net/tun in a composefile for a reason.

There’s no „windows in docker”, but rather „handy windows vm orchestrator with nice UI in a container”. A bit of a mouthful.

Taganrog, Kuban, Green and Yellow Klyns, Kursk…

If we start to enumerate, Russia has a lot of territories they’ve ethnically cleansed to call them „historically Russian territories”.

Yo! That last statement doesn’t say what you want it to say.

Unless it does, in which case I’m outta here.

My viewing history can legally drink in US in a year. What do you mean „guess”?

Oh, trust me, you will.

the dreams in which I’m dying are the best I’ve ever had

You’re jumping ahead of the train. Draft can be edited multiple times before it becomes law. If it becomes law.

So no, this is not anywhere close to being resolved.

After

Addendum: please stop promoting Medusa as a source. They are disgusting fuckers.

Googling at least until fairly recently meant „I consulted an index of Internet”. It is a means to get to the bit of information.

Asking ChatGPT is like asking a well-behaved parrot in the library and believing every word it says instead of reading the actual book the librarian would point you towards.

So that manufacturers can patch up remote exploits, duh!

I don’t get it, I regularly hold my breath for a second or two with no adverse consequences.

Now you have to trust the software used to do this, the algorithm itself, and that there was no tampering before the data got stored. Which is something truly verifiable by a very tiny subset of population and even then with full cooperation from authorities. This is the opaqueness of countermeasures.

Vote counting is not a mathematical problem, but a sociological one. Any „always correct machine” is useless if people can’t reasonably trust it.

Paper ballots don’t scale - you can’t stuff ballots without someone being present - and are designed exactly in the problem space vote counting itself occupies. As an additional evidence in their favor, autocratic regimes and corrupt politicians are way too eager to switch to electronic voting.

It’s not checks that are the issue, but the scalability of the offensive and the inevitable opaqueness of countermeasures.

deleted by creator

So what I hear is that if I manage to get through AI driven screening process, I’ll be the top candidate. If.

It’s all the other men. Always.

https://arxiv.org/html/2410.12835v1