The smart card in your id.

Lmao at the prevention section. It list a ton of individual strategies to go to sleep more easily and somewhere in the middle it’s like “also maybe it could be your job draining you”.

Sung to the tune of Corning My Religion, of course.

F

So, I looked up the term on Wikipedia. It sais: “An Internet meme, or meme ([/miːm/], [MEEM]), is a cultural item (such as an idea, behavior, or style) that spreads across the Internet, primarily through social media platforms]. Internet memes manifest in a variety of formats, including images, videos, GIFs], and other viral content. Key characteristics of memes include their tendency to be parodied, their use of intertextuality, their viral dissemination, and their continual evolution. The term meme was originally introduced by Richard Dawkins in 1972 to describe the concept of cultural transmission.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_meme

I’ll let you be the judge of whether this fits that definition or not. (And whether it’s worth your time arguing about something being a meme).

I wish I had a bed this fancy…

Thanks for the recs, I was recently looking for queer metal and found some stuff but not nearly the nearly enough…

…so what does it mean?

Neue Zweifel Welle?

Flamme? Ich dachte das ist erst an Pfingsten dran?

I’m not sure if I should be relating this hard but here we are…

You’re welcome. Just don’t let the sun explode. :)

I’ve had it with this “de at” censorship! This is not Facebook, you can say what you like!

de at, de at, de at!!!

Nuby’s Number Factory 🙈

“Der Beweis ist trivial.”

I already started :3

Was ist dieses “Snacklink”?

I don’t have any issue with Nostr, it honestly doesn’t interest me very much at all. But since it came up, let me tell you a little anecdote:

A few months ago I opened the Wikipedia article on Nostr, which states in the last sentence of the overview that:

Nostr was created as a result of perceived moderation issues on Twitter, as well as both technical and cultural disagreements with other protocols such as ActivityPub and Secure Scuttlebutt.

for which it cites the original blog entry where the protocol was introduced. Since I was interested in what these disagreements might be, I read through the post. And while I did find out what the criticisms of AP and SSB were, I also had a different train of thought going on too:

After reading the short summary, I thought to myself “Well that sounds like a nice hobby project, but isn’t that just BBS with crypto (and over the internet instead of telephone lines)?” That changed, however, when I read somewhere else that relays can also query other relays for their posts, after which I though “Well that sounds like a nice hobby project, but isn’t that just NNTP with crypto (and over the internet instead of usenet)?”

Again, none of this is an issue for me and I don’t really have any problems with the protocol itself but what did rub me the wrong way was that towards the end of the blog post, in the Q&A, it says the following:

This is very simple. Why hasn’t anyone done it before?

I don’t know, but I imagine […]

and idk, not actively looking for prior art seems a bit lazy to me ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don’t see the issue?

Was denn jetzt schon wieder passiert?