i am more than willing to engage on any positive claim you want to make (i probably agree with a lot of them). what i’m not willing to do is tolerate personal attacks and dogpiling.
- 12 Posts
- 3.24K Comments
no, they’re right (on this topic, anyway)
it’s a veterinary procedure
you have no evidence for such a claim
2·1 day agohonestly don’t care if it’s real
ad hominem
Animal consumption causes factory farming
no, it doesn’t
i don’t think this is proven. can you cite something?
please cite an animal behavior paper that supports your claim
- Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
consent must be informed. animals can’t be informed anymore than a door can.
The same is true when people neuter or spay their pets.
at least you are consistent on this point
Animals can communicate with others in their species, meaning that they can obtain and give consent to others of their species.
this is a leap of logic.
131·2 days agothis comment doesn’t commit any fallacy. it is just pointing out dishonesty
the issue was consent. are you conceding that consent is absurd from something that we cannot communicate with?
doors dont consent for you to jam your keys in them.
your source about beef relies on poore-nemecek 2018, a paper with dubious methodology