Nah, the most popular language in the Philippines is tagalog and that is already a language that’s gender neutral. The word ‘Filipino’ is a colonial artifact—they were named after some guy named Philip. In that way, it is technically gendered considering the spanish influence, but no one I know considers it gendered in any way unless you put it like ‘pinoys or pinays’ etc. I know filipina or pilipina or pinay is used still, but I honestly haven’t heard it much except in america, but all filipino women I know, if you just asked ‘are you filipino?’ they would say yes.

Filipino is the gender neutral way :) I’m a half filipino raised in america though so take it with a grain of salt, but I honestly have never seen anyone use filipinx before

Who said it’s useful? It’s certainly cool and it makes Apple look like a chump, so that’s a win in my book

where are you finding affordable cabins

The justice system is widely known for its expediency

Why did you editorialize the title so much?

That’s what the comment is saying, yes

If the Rust version is released under MIT, simply fork it, rename it, and release under (A)GPL

I understand that Steam probably has a robust mechanism for understanding game behavior

I mean maybe they run your game in a monitored environment and record what kinds of things you do behind the scenes, but that’s a lot to ask for for every game uploaded. I honestly very much doubt it.

Linux was 100% an alternative to me, not sure why it isn’t? Why isn’t linux an alternative to any operating system?

im further left than whoever made this, so dont take it the wrong way but this is a fucking stupid meme. Surely the libs can do better than this… whatever this is… right? Like… this is some boomer-tier stuff

that’s from 6 years ago

haz’d

username checks out

Well I work at an AI company so try making that make sense for her and her bosses

how work with tariffs?

How can chatgpt improve my software engineering life? I don’t mind the copilot PR stuff, but that is so small potatoes haha and saves me like an hour of my day reviewing junior code (which I should be doing by hand anyway, I don’t want to offload that to the toaster, I want my juniors knowing it was me reviewing their code). What else does chatgpt offer for me, an engineer who’s been doing this for over a decade now? I know how to create greenfield technology. I have created video conferencing applications that were HIPAA compliant, implemented authentication a bazillion times in every configuration, I’ve built a flight search and booking engine (with PCI compliance because American Express was a client), I’ve built CI tools for companies that automatically rewrote your PRs to use the company tech stack and committed on your behalf and fixed your PRs for you (we had a custom standard library that was easy to not use and our bot would rewrite your code using it).

I’m just saying, I deal with problems that ChatGPT is horrible at solving. ChatGPT does not know how to build video conferencing (especially using web tech). It does not know how to do HIPAA compliance. It does not know about PCI compliance. It is only as good as its inputs and the problems I’m working with, what inputs does it have? It’s not like there are a million flight booking tools out there with source code available and extensive documentation (have you ever dealt with a GDS before? Sabre? Amadeus? Have you seen their docs? What inputs does ChatGPT have that I don’t?). These are all relatively solved problems, but ChatGPT’s inputs are not closed source software, which is where most of this stuff is in (and often not at all on GitHub, so again, what are ChatGPT’s inputs?)

It has to be able to do all of this while justifying its energy costs. I’m a human being first and foremost and I see every day the destruction humans are doing to this planet. Lots of people dying in floods in the US, and that is definitely humans impact. I need to justify it.

I make no assertions of their legality

I don’t try to compare you to ChatGPT

My boss does, and I’m a software engineer.

I want chatgpt to remove code and keep tests passing. Why is that such a hard thing for ai? It cannot reliably remove useless code from my codebase without making tests fail. I want to see a PR from chatgpt that has a greater amount of of lines removed than added. I want it to actually improve my codebase by removing the places where bugs can exist (lines of code). I want my tests to keep passing.

C++. SQLite. sqlite3_open() returns 14. Code is run with root privileges.

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4636970/why-do-i-get-unable-to-open-database-file-while-it-works-from-a-unit-test
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26546150/sqlite3-sqlite3-open-succeeds-sqlite3-exec-fails-with-cantopen-error-14
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76204563/raise-privileges-to-open-a-sqlite3-root-database-on-linux-c-programming

Those were my results in my search using those exact terms. Did I do worse than a phd chatgpt 5 ai?

Liberals love nationalism