

Plus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
Just another person bringing love, peace, freedom through the judicious use of 🤜
Plus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
God, no, they’re already starving!
Hussein and Gadaffi are great object lessons in why it’s good to gtfo while you can
It would be a regular sized sub that’s a drone mothership, crewed entirely by midgets
An ounce of high explosive won’t take down a plane. Even at cruising altitude.
Apparently, the solution to this is retrorockets -
Once clear of the plane a single large main chute opens. The deployment of the main chute triggers the deployment of four long rods which hang beneath the pallet. As soon as the rods touch the ground fires, slowing the BMD to a descending speed between 6 m/s and 7 m/s and giving it a relatively soft landing. This system entered service in 1975 and allows a BMD to be relatively safely parachuted with both the driver and the gunner.
Fuck off right off with that briefcase shit, the only non-cringe nuke is the Davy Crockett. Russia’s got fuck all to say to the atomic recoilless rifle of freedom.
Yo, the mods here are all big jerks
Say what you will about the guy, he’s got more experience shooting down civilian jets than almost anyone.
he was on a plane that crashed in Russia today, possibly because it collided with a a2a missile.
Air defense was also active around Moscow, where it allegedly shot down a plane full of mercenaries.
Hahaha.
Also, per the BBC’s reporting:
Earlier, a Wagner-linked Telegram channel Grey Zone reported that the jet was shot down by air defences in Tver region, north of Moscow.
Surprisingly not surprising.
I like that they didn’t even try to translate boy kisser into Russian
Ok, but that caption is completely wrong about what, “the dictatorship of the proletariat,” means.
I like that they had to bring Ukraine into it for no apparent reason.
Good point, a nuclear holocaust can only improve the economy of Russia.
Probably because adapting a boat is easier and cheaper.
Genocides are ok if they’re “domestic affairs”? That’s a bad case of brainworms, kid.
Edit: more accurate quote
You’re looking too narrowly. By getting devs to cater to whatever gets rolled out in Blink and v8, google extends the power they have over the whole ecosystem by making any browser that doesn’t follow them look “broken” (as opposed to, not slavishly following everything google does).
It also increases the difficulty of making a competing browser engine by adding tons of complexity (for questionable value), only further entrenching google’s dominance. But at least you get some stupid new CSS3 behaviors (that people will bitch about not working in Firefox or Safari) so I guess it’s worth it.
China’s system led to invasions, wars, and mass murder. China’s system has no way for the citizens to do anything about it. The US system does, and citizens have forced change repeatedly throughout US history.
And to reiterate, the US government is not perfect and still does bad things. But it’s entirely better than China’s.
Bibi doesn’t do moral quandaries, bro. He wouldn’t even understand the question.