Sadly I think it’s the last one. Of course I can’t read his mind, but I honestly think he is just as lame and broken as he seems.

I like some of the ‘nature inspired’ ones

Trump: makes incorrect claim

Moderator: Actually there is no evidence that happened

Trump: well I saw it on TV! Someone said it on TV! Someone wouldn’t just go and say something on TV if it wasn’t true!

Shouldn’t the president of the country have a bit of higher standard of evidence than “I saw someone say it on TV”?

Problem is if Trump gets back in he’ll clean house as much as possible so it’s better to have people remain quiet and keep their heads down so they’re in place to stop anything he tries as opposed to making it obvious they need to be removed by a tyrant.

Interacting with another human being as it they were a human being instead of a servant bringing you food is creepy?

Wait, doesn’t everybody walk around with a pocket psychrometric chart?

I know you’re supposed to confirm things for yourself but I’m very sensitive to audio and sounds have a tendency to stick in my brain. I’ll take your word on that so that I don’t have to stick my head in a blender later tonight.

What will be left will be mentally ill and addicts which can further be helped by throwing money at support instead of punishing them.

I’m lawful neutral until the clip breaks, which it always does, and then I go chaotic neutral.

But then the next person who prints something will print over it and have your file in their file!

Ic hæfde to witan: sind þas word gemæne oððe is þæs unþeawfulle YouTube wifru forþfæreð, ic mean “eorðan Englisc swylce þa leornere witaþ is fægere and riht”?

Wait, what happened here? Is this picture supposed to be offensive somehow? Is there a place you can see deleted lemmy comments like you can see deleted reddit comments?

The corporations can fuck right off because they steal more from creators than pirates ever could. But directly supporting independent creators you like is a good thing that should be lauded. Someone dying penniless in the street because they chose to make things that enhanced people’s lives instead of going into a soul sucking banking career or some shit is a travesty if you ask me.

I still think mechanical watches are a pretty neat idea. I also never forget my towel so there’s some hope for me yet.

That’s father than I would take it personally

That’s not my theory. That’s the data.

One interpretation could be that women were constantly engaged in strenuous endurance activities and so through evolution built up tolerances against exhaustion that at least rivals if not exceeds that of men. And one historical activity that used a lot of stamina and took a lot of tolerance against fatigue was the way in which ancient humans hunted.

That’s not what a theory is, it’s a hypothesis at best, hope that helped.

Women were first allowed to compete in marathons in 1972. In 1972 the men’s record was 2:10:30. The current record is 2:00:35 which is about an 8% difference. Pretty close to the difference between men and women currently.

The first women’s record was 3:40:22 and the current women’s record is 2:11:53.11 which is 40% faster.

Once funding for women’s athletics reaches parity and once girls are encouraged into athletics as much as boys, then we will see if the ladies catch up. So far they’re doing a pretty good job catching up, and you can’t look at one current window in time and say you have the answer, you need to look at trends.

Evidence shows that women have better endurance for long distances. They tend to be less susceptible to fatigue and beyond 195 miles are actually faster than men. Considering humans were better at outlasting their prey and chasing them to exhaustion rather than burst speed, this data indicates that women are at least as capable as men at those tasks if not better.

You don’t call a lion immoral because lions can’t comprehend morality. That doesn’t mean that humans can do the same actions without being judged morally. Lions can also kill other lions which would be more comparable to murder than your hunting example and still they wouldn’t be held morally responsible and yet humans would if they killed another human. A lot of animals rape too, doesn’t mean it’s moral for humans to do.

The difference is that we CAN understand morality which is why we are held to moral standards and animals aren’t. This is like, pretty basic stuff and shouldn’t be at all confusing. Maybe read a book or two before having loud opinions?

These mitts were made for murderin and that’s just what they’ll do