The man had had money, high class peers, and has traveled the world his whole life. How is he more white trash than the Trailer Park Boys?

They are in my heart

If your income is 9+ figures, the media comes to you to find out what you think about it.

It’s fucking psychosis. Yes, they are vain. But they are also in denial. Does anyone actually think that this looks better? If I want to look the best I can, if I’m absolutely obsessed with it enough to get surgery to do so, I am staying far away from whatever the fuck this is because it just looks fucked up. It makes zero sense.

Feels like maybe you were expecting argument, but we’re all pleased

Yeah, I think she’s about 20

Cool. Now release the Epstein Files.

Or just… not be a trading partner.

It’s an older picture. Her name is Elizabeth Riley. She doesn’t post much anymore, but she’s still got some good stuff on her Onlyfans page (https://onlyfans.com/lizrileyxo)

Won’t catch me signing one, I promise you that.

Anyone who buys a fucking motor vehicle that comes with Terms and Conditions agreement, let alone one that can be spontaneously and remotely turned off… you’re a fucking moron. And Tesla needs to be sued into oblivion. That shit should NOT be legal.

Batman questions anyone and anything and has a plan for any eventuality, PARTICULARY those that pose a global scale threat. It’s nothing personal, it’s just reasonable precaution. That’s basically his true superpower. He also does trust Superman as a person, as a colleague and friend. I don’t think he ever considers there to be a true risk that Superman turns on humanity of his own will. However, Superman is susceptible to mind control, to magic, to unpredictable forms of kryptonite. And he is not the only living Kryptonian in existence either. It would be stupid not to plan for such threats.

Lex depending on the version, may or may not think that Superman actually poses a willful threat to humanity. But even if he also trusts that Superman is what he appears to be, a selfless hero that only wants to help people, he probably hates that idea even more. He usually doesn’t distrust Superman’s intent. He hates what it says about and does to human-kind, and by extension, himself. He things depending on an alien demigod will make humanity weak and complacent. He thinks that Superman holds the Earth back from reaching their potential. That it permanently neuters them from become Supermen themselves. So he makes it his mission to ruin Superman however he can. If he can kill him, good. Not a problem anymore. If he can publically discredit him, sow distrust across the globe, that’s good too, maybe better. People who distrust him won’t depend on him and may, in fact, fear him. As a result they are more likely to better themselves, their technology, their science, to rival and fight back against Superman.

TL:DR: Batman takes precautions. Lex hates and attempts to kill or sabotage. They’re not the same.

Antibodies are LITERALLY the point. It’s the mechanism by which our immune system identifies pathogens and triggers an immune response to them. If they diminish, your immune system is slower to respond and less effective at doing so. If they’re gone, it’s as if your immune system has never seen the pathogen before and has to adapt from zero again. Vaccines are a way to arm you with those antibodies without as much risk either from genuine infection or your immune system killing you in the attempt to figure out how to kill the new pathogen. You want the antibodies. They keep you healthier.

TL;DR: Vaccine=Antibodies=Good

The guy who complains when anyone even TALKS about it… the one that said that the stuff in the case files (produced under his administration) was mostly phony… the one who tried to keep the Wall Street Journal from releasing the fact that he had a creepy cryptically worded birthday letter with a drawn named woman on it given to Epstein, and then punitively sued them after they published anyway… the one who instructed his fixer to have a closed door, private meeting with Epstein’s assistant who is convicted for the same crimes Epstein committed, who has perjured herself to avoid trouble before, who clearly got better accommodations in a lower security prison as a result of some undisclosed deal with this fixer and Trump, and who needs only to please Trump, who is heavily implicated in her crimes, to get herself a full pardon… HE wants full transparency… yeah… that makes sense.

I’m here for that. The new Superman was a breath of fresh air, not just because it was an incomparably better representation of the character than Man Of Steel’s version but because it was so hopeful.

If you ever watched The Colbert Report back in the day, he played a version of himself as an extreme conservative. It was parody, but plenty on the right who only half paid attention though that he was being genuine. Trump is a moron and would totally have been one of them and wanted to hire the guy who said ridiculous shit on television.

If The Colbert Report were still on TV, Trump would have appointed him to Secretay of State.

No it wasn’t. Gerrymandering that demonstrably targeted racial or other protected demographics or otherwise broke the voting rights act was illegal. But gerrymandering as a concept has never been illegal in the US. State and federal courts, including SCOTUS, have ruled several times that there is no constitutional law against it, nor a mechanism to objectively identify it, nor a means to remedy it. If it violates those other laws in the process, it gets rejected and kicked back to be fixed. But if not, there is nothing illegal about it under current law, despite it being blatant vote manipulation. What SCOTUS has rolled back is certain oversight for the voters right act and have given legislatures the out to claim that blatant racial disenfranchisement is political, not racial.

Edit: There might be individual state laws or constitutions making gerrymandering illegal or otherwise removing the districting power from the legislature. I’m not aware of any, specifically, but I wouldn’t be shocked if there were. I’m only speaking on a federal level.

It’s regulated per state. What Texas is doing, while highly unethical and, frankly, fraudulent, is entirely legal and up to the Texas state legislature to decide. Only the federal government may supersede it and only with a change to the constitution which prescribes this power to the states. So, for the Texas legislature, yes it’s easier to modify the law. To change it without them, it is absolutely not easier.

Stuff removed, stuff added, everything pulled tight. It’s like taxidermy but for still alive vanity-obsessed women, and it often looks like it too.