KSA is dead in the water, though.

Blowing up Jeb is fun for the whole family, including Jeb.

Blowing up kittens is not fun, in any way, shape, or form, unless you’re a deranged psychopath.

No one will play such a game.

Alzheimer’s

Neurosyphilis, probably.

As long as you don’t care about consistency, maybe…

(I mean, since they can’t learn without retraining the whole model, if you’re writing anything of any significant length you’d basically need to refeed them the whole context and backstory so far every prompt, which I assume would eventually hit some prompt size limit…)

Correct.

Therefore selling it as something capable of reliably correctly answering questions is a criminal scam.

That’s victim blaming.

The fault is on the scammers selling the faulty product, not on the users who fall for the scam.

Well, then maybe they shouldn’t be selling this shit as a replacement for search engines, or making search engines worse to make us stop using them and use this shit instead, or shoving this shit on top of search engines to force us to use it even if we’re trying to use a search engine, should they‽ 😤

There are no paragraphs, which makes it too much effort to read.

Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice

… but often they come hand in hand.

Did she prove it?

kids today can actually watch every episode in order vs the rng of a child’s ability have access to a TV at the right time

I don’t know, we managed to watch episodic stuff like Dragon Ball well enough, even if we missed an episode once in a while.

And programmable VCRs were a thing.

Huh. This one comes with its own theme tune.

Yes, but made in a factory instead of a cow.

This, but unironically.

There’s plenty of objects out there made of CHONPS.

If we don’t kill ourselves first, at some point we’ll eat the Kuiper Belt and Oort cloud.

No, you’re watching the right ones.

I mean, except for the murders, maybe.

Personally I prefer Columbo, though.

DISCLAIMER: I’m just speculating, I haven’t touched c in decades and have no idea how Linux code works.

Generic headers here could refer to headers declaring common functions whose specific implementation might differ based on CPU architecture.

That is, the .h files would declare certain functions that other parts of the code can call to do CPU related stuff, and when compiling for a certain architecture you’d use different .c files implementing said functions for that specific architecture.

Obviously, since these headers will be common to multiple specific implementations, it’d be very important to have a standard or at least a consensus in regards to which functions they should declare, what they should return, and which parameters they should take.

From Linus’ quote there, I assume the Google “devs” (probably Gemini) must have included RISC-V specific stuff in the headers, which would be an extremely big no-no as it could break other implementations or the code calling these functions.

We’re watching different children’s shows…

In related news, Microsoft is retiring support for inline SVG images in Outlook for Web and New Outlook (which is just Outlook for Web in a trenchcoat and should be killed with fire), because apparently removing functionality is easier than fixing vulnerabilities.

I expect Edge will also be dropping support for SVGs in the near future.

Favourite of all time?

Wing Commander (2 if I have to pick one, otherwise 1, 2, and secret missions).

Monkey Island (3 if I have to pick one, 1 to 3 otherwise).

Third is difficult, but… Disco Elysium, I guess…?

(What games I’ve spent the most time playing, though…? Definitely Crusader Kings 2 and 3, followed by Stellaris.)

SCSI ain’t weird!