I’m pretty sure he was involved with the liberation theology movements in Argentina before the previous pope clamped down on it (in his capacity as a cardinal)

you can model the tax on the supply or the demand. in most simple models the outcome is the same

actually that’s written with stone

well yeah, there’s only so much sexy to go around. how else do you propose we save some for spiders?

sorry, I’m a little slow today. how is this seemingly keeping the economy afloat?

you’re assuming they’re doing it by accident

yeah but by Cantor’s diagonal argument, you still wouldn’t be listing all the real numbers

assuming the interval includes all of the real numbers, then it is definitely larger than aleph null (the size of all countable infinities)

that’s why he said: light years away

as in: there is still a great amount of distance Orban thinks Ukraine needs to cover before they converge with the EU admissions acceptability criteria

God, I can’t believe I just had to defend Orban

every dollar you raise, the fewer customers you get. the point is that you should want to raise the price whenever the relative drop in customers is less than the relative increase in price to maximise profits (where marginal cost is marginal benefit :) )

I’m a little confused. Don’t we want this to be as transparent as possible to limit conspiracies?

some injustices are structural

3rd panel, second shelf from the bottom

actually history is just our collective understanding of the past, so if it changes, history changes

Right, and this Walmart in Europe would be where exactly?

I think the worry is a WW3 with China

I’m sure you do :)

That being said, by choosing not to break gender norms, are you not helping reinforce what an idea of female is?

(OK, maybe I’m going round in circles here)

Anyway, you have a lovely day :)

but isn’t the difference in one case free gender expression, whereas the other is (e.g. for trans male to female): I think I’m a woman and to show this I’m going to specifically dress in the ‘stereotypically womanliest’ way possible?

or, more generally, people shouldn’t be using gender as the reason to dress and act the way they want to. else they’re affirming that a certain gender means a certain form of acting.

obviously this is an exaggeration. but since we’re playing the game.

ok, I’ll bite and role-play devil’s advocate. how do you respond to such a take?

well if the feminist movement is all about deconstructing gender and removing fixed ideas of gender, then surely the trans movement is reversing this by reinforcing stereotypes in how people dress etc. /s