It’s almost like it isn’t for the reasons he says…what a shocking and implausible thought.

Removed by mod

Trump begins forming a unit of loyal soldiers who are willing to kill US citizens.

Practice and precedence.

How did you possibly come to such a confident conclusion there is no value in further gerrymandering? Cleary they see value or they wouldn’t be trying to get it done before 2026.

And it’s worked so they will rely on it even more to prevent any loss of control in 2026.

They are not fugitives from the law nor are they slaves to the republican agenda. What human beings are willing, able and tasked with the responsibility to prevent this?

It is the externalization of internal mental processes, causing technological dependencies for even basic thinking on the subject it issues for. It is fundamentally the same as being dependent on a parent for answers, as a child. At some point the parent must force the child into independence to become capable of functioning, to build the infrastructure to answer its own questions by memorizing, and later discerning, the answers.

If we should regress to, or raise our children with, such a dependency, we will become enslaved to those who control these technologies, making useful thought into a subscription service. Technology is incredibly empowering but at some point it becomes a necessity and we are beholden to those who control such things, spawning a techno feudalism in which we are as tied to a corporation’s technology as serfs were to the lord’s lands.

“Correctly”…

They will steal America and imprison, kill or deport anyone who they don’t like. How many steps to fascism before enough people act?

Pardons should be reserved solely for crimes against the state or crimes committed in service to eh state. Crimes against individuals by other individuals should not be pardonable.

“Rich person that has everything the working class suffers to obtain, culturally appropriates the experiences of the working class to benefit themselves.”

Rich people will steal anything.

Funny how its always so important to ban useful and empowering things for citizens in the name of safety but someone we can’t ban business practices that cause mass extinctions, change the climate, impoverish the working class or kill enough of us to only be seen as a statistic instead of people. If they actually cared about safety, they would be banning the things that cause mass suffering and death, not VPNs. We should be opposed to these kinds of bans on the principle that it further disempowered us so we are less able to deal with the threats of all the mass suffering and death that they refuse to keep us safe from.

It should not matter at all what he wrote. This is absolutely the wrong question to focus on.

Rich and ambitious people pollute everywhere they go.

Because he’s better than you at being you. Gotta pull out your hail mary behaviors to compete and when backed into a corner, Doug Ford is a brute and barbarian. “Why do you make me do this!?” he screams…

These people have always wanted to escape accountability to the community. They want nothing more than to be free to use their considerable wealth and influence without regard for anything but their own interests. Private power seeks to destroy public power and escape the confines of other people’s needs.

It was always about obedience.

Making sure you pay the absolute most possible for everything you buy. Welcome to tyranny capitalism. You will be charged a poor tax in the form of optimised pricing exploitation.

Half your base cries when adults talk too loud. You indulged and nurtured a base to be incapable of resisting the DNC leadership and in doing denied them the skillset needed to be tough enough to fight. You coddled the entire left and stunted their development and now you need fighters that don’t exist. Why were you not promoting toughness before it became apparent that’s what you now need? Oh right, because you’d offend and lose your voting base if you had told them to toughen up years ago…