
Imagine calling a house a pod.
Imagine calling a house a pod.
Iran is a low bar to set, I think we can agree there.
My critique was really against tossing modesty in the trash as if it’s completely without value. A man being protective of his womenfolk is also seen as something bad, which is so irrational.
I gave you the other end of the extreme, where there is no attention paid to the woman’s dignity.
The reason I brought this up was because it is something that I have seen be applauded. No one said, “hum, maybe we shouldn’t let women be in a vulnerable position in front of tyrannical cops”.
If you don’t see an issue here, then you can’t really claim to care about the dignity of women, and that says something about you.
But there is still pressure, otherwise a woman would not have been driven to go to the street to protest nude.
People think differently. Just because you don’t see yourself being content with wearing a full veil on a sunny beach does not mean that another woman can’t be.
Removed by mod
She should be like those lefty heroines who get arrested naked by the police.
I looked at the title of this post and thought “this seems rather innocuous, let’s click”.
Then I noticed the black figure at the bottom. Ah, so this is what this shit is about.
Why do everyone on this site seem to be an angry sperg? If someone wants to be modest, why do you get your panties in a bunch?
Can someone explain what “react native” is?
LMAO
“I may be vertically challenged, but I am horizontally gifted. Rawr!”
Maybe they were going to play after finishing up the dishes?
This shitty interpretation says more about the person making the “meme” than the artist who created the original ad.
It’s grotesque enough to still be a problem, I’m sure. Perhaps the laws haven’t caught up to stunts like these and that’s why they are getting away with it?
We all age and die. What matters is what we do with our lives.
In short, this is some BS tweet (and blatant propaganda) that seemingly has no actual science backing it.
Firstly, no source was provided to back up his claim about female suicide rates. The Statista link from this comment suggests that he is talking out of his ass.
Secondly, that alone would not have been enough to establish a causative relation (no fault divorce => less female suicides). Because correlation does not equal causation.
a random consumer*
Your engagement is valuable for current or future shareholders of the company owning the platform. It is of paramount importance that you engage as much as possible. Although not enough, we would recommend for example, sleeping 7 hours instead of 8 to make time for engagement such liking/disliking and commenting.
Thanks to all the influence operations, surveillance, AI slop, malicious scrapers, spam and bad-faith ideologues (from all sides).
Edit: typpo
We many times lament when the government overreaches. This is the kind of Trojan horse that enables the government to overreach.
One might think, this seems innocuous and beneficial, so go ahead, right? You have to ask yourself, how is it moral for the government to, with the threat of violence, force every home to be built with solar panels? Because that’s the implication.
If I’m a small business, and I build a house without solar panels, is it right that I be bankrupted or/and be put in jail?
Nailed it.
Just look at Barrack “Black Drone Operator” Obama, and Joe “Sniff Sniff” Biden who is a blatant Zionist who acted chocked and insulted when he was called a Palestinian (I believe by Trump). Both supporting the violent occupation of Palestine, of course.
The correct answer right here