• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    6 months ago

    Fun fact, they’re still providing USAID funding to Israel and Egypt but stopped providing funding to Ukraine.

    • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      Trump executive order requiring the state and all state-funded education institutes to not acknowledge Ukrainian as a language separate from Russian coming in 3…

  • Cat@ponder.catOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    Wow, I guess I better get used to a ton of USA events and news per day for the next years.

    • _thebrain_@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Probably not. Sooner rather than later most free press will be shut down by trump and the only news that anyone will get is whatever there government wants you to hear. Stories like this will disappear.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s already the case.

        Do you remember every single mainstream outlet falling in line to promote the Iraq war? To blackout the antiwar protests? Going to Occupy Wallstreet and interviewing random weirdos instead of the organizer’s designated press people? The coverage of Ukraine? The coverage of Israel?

      • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Don’t you think that’s a bit of a hysterical take?

        Stories like this one, someone noticing that a website has been taken down, will disappear??

        It’s hardly the peak of investigative journalism or a complicated story requiring hundreds of hours of work by a trained journalist.

              • AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                The examples given are about Trump limiting access for news agencies to the government, and trying to bully big news orgs. How would those things prevent someone writing a story about a public website disappearing?

                Don’t get me wrong, what he’s doing is bad for press freedom and will have a chilling effect on the more complicated stories that need more journalistic input and explanation to gain traction and public understanding, but as I said “this kind of story” isn’t exactly complicated and saying “stories like this will disappear” is just not realistic.

                • Laurel Raven@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I’m pretty sure by “stories like this” they’re referring to ones that highlight the activities of the Trump administration, not literally stories about websites going down (if that’s a mischaracterization of what you’re saying, I apologize, but I’m not sure what your meaning was if not that)

        • _thebrain_@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Have you watched the news in the US in the time period since the original post? Has any news media even mentioned this? A post on mastodon is great. I would venture that 99% of the population from the US doesn’t use Mastodon, tho I don’t really know for sure the numbers . Of the percentage that do, how many are going to see this person’s post?

  • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Via NPR:

    A question of legality

    The question of the legality of any attempt to change the status of USAID is connected to its origins. The agency was created in 1961 when President John F. Kennedy signed an executive order after Congress passed the Foreign Assistance Act, which mandated the creation of an independent agency to focus on development separate from politics and the military. The agency was formally established by Congress as an independent agency in 1998.

    That means “it cannot just be undone, at this point, by an executive order,” Konyndyk said. “To actually disestablish the agency and dissolve it into the State Department will take an act of Congress.”

    Source: Why does Musk want USAID ‘to die’? And why did its website disappear? : Goats and Soda 

    I’m doubtful relying on congress is any comfort either however.

    • FireTower@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Really silly question tbh. Trafficking drugs pays for itself and the torture. The CIA may be the only government agency making a net profit.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Is it an accident?

      Trump (and specifically, the heritage foundation) believe in isolationism. Alienating its geopolitical and geographical neighbors serves that purpose. Think of it as the groundwork for a full North Korea style break from non-state controlled culture.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        He’s going to utterly crash the US economy he’s not going to be able to pull it off.

        • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          How many authoritarian nations do you know with excellent, well-functioning economies? Do you think good class mobility serves any purpose for a regime like Putin’s, or Kim Jong Un’s? Destroying our economy is part of the plan.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        In 2016, Trump’s issue with Libya was that we didn’t send troops in to steal their oil, and then make a deal with whatever faction was willing to sell us the oil cheaply. Same with Iraq. You’re are wildly overestimating his moral character if you think he is trying to dismantle the american empire.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Alright so hold on, USAID is not equipped to stop the Israeli military. So that’s right out. And the vaccination ruse was a CIA operation.

          It is interesting to see that USAID has an office meant to react to rapidly changing political situations. But there are several things about the Cuban Internet story. First, obviously it’s not torture and similar stupid stuff. Second, from the article it looks like it was never properly authorized and was beyond what USAID is meant to do.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              The entire Western world maintains that he won that election. So we’re going to disagree on that right away. Then if you read what it was for it’s literally aid funds not weapons or such. Then it’s not even flowing through Guaido, but local NGOs instead.

              You may want to read the articles you use as sources before using them.

              • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Oh, you’re a neoliberal, that explains a lot. I guess you wont care about any actions that override another countries Democratic process when its funneled through NGOs or provides America a strategic advantage.

                Condescending conservatives who are naive enough to take the most milquetoast yahoo news explanation at face value are not going to be worth discussion, because yalls politics actually align with USAids mission plan.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Wow that’s quite a leap. You’re the one who brought a Yahoo news article to the discussion. Now it’s not to be trusted? So bring one you do trust. And the entire point is that we are trying to respect the democratic process in Venezuela. Saying I have the army so I win is not a democratic process.

              • Seasm0ke@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                6 months ago

                Guaido boycotted the election btw and declared himself the winner with no votes

          • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            The point I was illustrating is that USAID is and always was a tool of the CIA.

            USAID is absolutely equipped to tell the Israeli military “We’re not going to give you one of our trucks and a landing pad for a blackhawk at our pier”.

            • Maggoty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              How are they equipped to do that? Are you going to stand there in the way of an army with your clipboard?

              And I’m sorry but Internet access and social media doesn’t evoke scary secret agent the way you’re trying to use it. At best it’s the furthest extent of soft power, which is USAID’s purpose. At worst it’s an unsanctioned covert program that got shut down and swept under the rug.

              • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 months ago

                Yes, they are equipped to not hand over their resources. They’re also equipped to not lie and cover it up afterwords.

                • Maggoty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  Okay so a few things here. USAID wasn’t even on that side of the delivery system, that was WFP. Far from covering it up, the raid was headline news and is covered in an OIG report on the pier. Finally, USAID is not a military organization. If a military unit lands near them and demands a truck they are going to hand it over. They do not possess weapons or training. This entire line of argument is ridiculous.

  • pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    🎶 Just want one thing, just to play the king
    But the castle’s crumbled and you’re left with just a name 🎵