• Chainweasel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    edit-2
    6 个月前

    I wish.
    In Idiocracy the public wanted the smart people in charge, President Camacho even stepped aside when he knew he was unqualified compared to Joe.
    In whatever the hell this is, the public demonizes intelligence.

    • BranBucket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 个月前

      This.

      It’s an absolutely unfair comparison for Camacho, who was a pretty good leader considering the setting of the film.

    • dipcart@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 个月前

      Carl Sagan, in 1995:

      I have a foreboding of an America in my children’s or grandchildren’s time – when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what’s true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness…

      The dumbing down of American is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30 second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance

      • Hasherm0n@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 个月前

        Isaac Asimov in 1980:

        There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.

    • Laereht@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 个月前

      I guess it shows what I believe: that eventually humanity will tire of punching ourselves if we don’t cause our own extinction first.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 个月前

    Posts like this are pure cope. Idiocracy was better than the actively malicious government we have now.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 个月前

      They were stupid but not evil.

      Nobody in the movie sought to oppress others for their own gain.

  • hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 个月前

    President Comacho tried to help the country. He didn’t actively work against it.

  • RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 个月前

    Oh we’re there. Remember the Covidiots shitting out their intestinal lining to own the libs?

    We been there.

  • No_Money_Just_Change@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    Deutsch
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 个月前

    Sadly no.

    Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho changed his believes when presented with evidence of the contrary and stepped down from power as soon as someone more suitable was found

    We are in a timeline where the president of idiocracy would be the better option

    • BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 个月前

      It’s worse. There is stupidity and ignorance and then there is melevelence and outright hatred.

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 个月前

      Not only is he not just some “thumbs up guy” he’s “libertarian” president of Argentina Javier Gerardo Milei… Who is currently doing a bang up job of ruining his country too.

      We live in the worst timeline. :/

  • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 个月前

    The rest of the world is watching America through splayed fingers, shaking heads with embarrassment.

  • MNByChoice@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 个月前

    Huh. Usually the chain is removed so no one gets hurt or has to be careful.

    Am I wrong that the chain is in place?

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 个月前

    Idiocracy usually gets criticized for it’s embrace of eugenics. But today I’m going to point out that the future envisioned by the movie is 100% right wing. Not since Red Dawn has a move more closely aligned with reactionary politics.

    What’s the conflict of the movie? Stupidity. That’s the cause of all the problems. Not institutions, not systems. Even corporate greed and mismanagement are down to dumb executives. Because if smart and qualified people were in charge, there would be no problems with corporations. Government? Same story, we just need an average white guy with dictatorial power to come in rescue the DEI hires.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 个月前

      embrace of eugenics

      I genuinely don’t know where this comes from? Did I miss something in the movie?

      • uienia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 个月前

        Because its premise is that stupid parents exclusively get stupid children, and stupid parents gets more children than intelligent parents. That is how the world ends up as it is in the movie.

        But that is of course not how intelligence works. Stupid parents can get intelligent children, otherwise intelligent people would never have existed in the first place.

        Of course that doesn’t make the movie embrace eugenics. It is just an unimportantfictional premise meant to explain why the world is at it is in the movie.

        • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 个月前

          But that is of course not how intelligence works.

          But intelligence is influenced by genetics. Early twin studies of adult individuals have found a heritability of IQ between 57% and 73%, with some recent studies showing heritability for IQ as high as 80%.

          NYWATDBIDSYWV

            • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 个月前

              The movie doesn’t imply 100%.

              The hypothesis they use is that stupid people have more kids and become the majority. It shows the genetic selection occuring over many generations.

      • TheObviousSolution@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 个月前

        Recognizing a trend versus being a proponent of the most horrible to approach it is an Idiocracy level leap in logic. The movie does not endorse eugenics in any way. At most, it displays a caricature of things, like genetics, as movies are apt to do.