Tony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 天前Net neutrality advocates won’t appeal loss, say they don’t trust Supreme Courtarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square40linkfedilinkarrow-up1699arrow-down13cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1696arrow-down1external-linkNet neutrality advocates won’t appeal loss, say they don’t trust Supreme Courtarstechnica.comTony Bark@pawb.social to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 天前message-square40linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
minus-squareZachariah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down3·5 天前Bummer. They since the outcome would be the same, they should make the SC go on record to rule on it. Put it in the history books.
minus-squareNatanael@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·4 天前Anything can be reconsidered by a later SCOTUS if they’re willing
minus-squareAnti_Iridium@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 天前Yeah, stare decisis means nothing anymore according to this Supreme court. They bend over backwards to get the outcome they desire.
minus-squareAnn Archy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 天前I got a fun little thing here in my hand that is quite appealing.
minus-squareRentlar@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·5 天前Knowing this Supreme Court, it could totally be worse than the same outcome.
minus-squareZorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·5 天前They could also deliberately go out of their way to make it worse.
Bummer. They since the outcome would be the same, they should make the SC go on record to rule on it. Put it in the history books.
Then it can’t be appealed later.
Anything can be reconsidered by a later SCOTUS if they’re willing
Yeah, stare decisis means nothing anymore according to this Supreme court.
They bend over backwards to get the outcome they desire.
I got a fun little thing here in my hand that is quite appealing.
Knowing this Supreme Court, it could totally be worse than the same outcome.
They could also deliberately go out of their way to make it worse.