Idk why the Air Force thinks it’s durable

  • Avicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Yea I am gonna bet Elon gave them lots of money to get them to take two of his trucks and say this so that red necks with fragile masculinities believe that they can find meaning in life by buying a truck which they think is battlefield material. Well they will (re)realise their stupidy once side panels start falling off.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      They are buying two non-functional Cybertrucks. It’s pretty standard to do weapons testing on non-functional vehicles.

      • garretble@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        81
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        With the cybertruck, “nonfunctional” could just mean it rolled off the lot five minutes ago.

      • ReasonablePea@sh.itjust.worksOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        My problem with this is the depiction of the cybertruck as some capable military vehicle vs any other conventional truck

        • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          They bought 33 vehicles. Two of them are cybertrucks. Kind of feels like you might be blowing this way out of proportion, just like the headline is.

          • kautau@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            4 days ago

            Yeah honestly the idea that they are considering cyber trucks to be possible future hostile vehicles seems like a good thing to me considering most people who bought them would be supporting ICE in Civil War II electric boogaloo

            • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              It’s also just a fairly unique vehicle in terms of its construction, so they’d be stupid not to test how their weapons work against it. Even if you’re 99% sure that Elon is full of shit with all his “Apocalypse proof” nonsense, you test for that 1% just to be safe. This is all completely routine stuff.

              • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I mean, sure, but they could also watch any YouTube vid of a guntuber actually shooting one. It’s nothing special.

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          Cybertrucks are kind of “bulletproof” so they are good for testing. They may be absolute garbage in almost every metric, but the parts that really matter for that kind of testing are more durable than the majority of consumer vehicles.

      • redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 days ago

        Read between the lines. They’re practicing targeting a cybertruck from the air. They bought a spare to test adjustments and repeatability. Somewhere there’s a well armed cybertruck owner sweating bullets.

  • Fedizen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Heres how to disable a cyber truck: hit the remote kill switch at tesla HQ.

    Solved it you fucking morons. You absolute idiots.

  • JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    I don’t think they think it’s durable. I think the loose body panels make for a more spectacular image when hit with a missle. Diffusion of blast energy and all that.

  • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Vehicles in general are pretty durable, vehicles getting damaged is generally the vehicle hitting something rather than something hitting it.

    I had the opportunity to smash a car up with a sledgehammer once (weird fundraiser), and i think i hurt my hands more than the car.

    Edit: also, not a bad idea for the military to know where to shoot these things in case some dumbass tries to run the gate at a base in one.

    • Azal@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s weird how I think of cars as “not durable” by growing up around fire departments.

      But I also use that as description on how equipment for fire depts needs to be made as this is the group that has competitions like “Who can cut a car in half the fastest” for training.

    • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      They bought two non-functional Cybertrucks. It’s pretty standard to do weapons testing on non-functional vehicles.

      • andyburke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        lol if you think the army saying this about these vehicles is normal:

        It said the Tesla pickups were “likely” to start appearing on the battlefield. It added that they don’t “receive the normal extent of damage expected upon major impact.”

        • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          They have thicker skin than other comparable vehicles. This has implications for weapon effectiveness, such as from shrapnel.