Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWe are not the sameslrpnk.netimagemessage-square55linkfedilinkarrow-up1636arrow-down117
arrow-up1619arrow-down1imageWe are not the sameslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Microblog Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square55linkfedilink
minus-squareCaptnNMorgan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 day agoWasn’t mansplaining, but the word you were trying to spell is mansplanation
minus-squaresunbrrnslapper@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·17 hours agoIt absolutely was. It was tangential to my comment. Information I already had (which you could glean from my comment). And completely unnecessary. Thanks for calling out the typo!
minus-squareCaptnNMorgan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoSo were you saying people called cocaine “speed” back then?
minus-squarecaptainlezbian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 hours agoI believe they were trying to say that the stimulant of the 50s was speed (aka an amphetamine)
minus-squareCaptnNMorgan@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 hour agoThen the person who originally responded to them wasn’t mansplaining, and used facts to contradict what they said. Then they acted like they already knew that
Wasn’t mansplaining, but the word you were trying to spell is mansplanation
It absolutely was. It was tangential to my comment. Information I already had (which you could glean from my comment). And completely unnecessary.
Thanks for calling out the typo!
So were you saying people called cocaine “speed” back then?
I believe they were trying to say that the stimulant of the 50s was speed (aka an amphetamine)
Then the person who originally responded to them wasn’t mansplaining, and used facts to contradict what they said. Then they acted like they already knew that