• GuyFawkes@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 day ago

    And we’re all reaping the benefits of it, right? RIGHT???

    Non-violent protest only works against those who have a conscience, with is NOT MAGAts.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Did you go? Did you talk to anyone when you were there? Have you spoken with them since? If your answer is no, then you’re just a loud bystander, who gives a fuck what you think. If all you know how to do is blow things up, then STFU and do it. Otherwise, try actually participating.

    • 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I humbly disagree. Protests can have a massive economic impact if they reach critical mass. Acts of violence also need a critical mass, but convincing people to protest is far easier than convincing them to commit acts of violence.

      Don’t go to work, block all traffic, don’t pay taxes, stop spending, attack all opposition. With enough participation, we can crash the economy in a single day and regain control within a week. Getting people to do what is necessary en masse is the hard part. Things will have to get worse before we get there.

    • s@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      I do realize your username is literally GuyFawkes. Nevertheless, when somebody is doing wrong, the first approach should be to use reason and empathy as a point of argument. If that fails, then work to starve the oppressor of what they seek to exploit until they find that pursuit to be no longer in their interests. If that fails, then use whatever means necessary to ensure oppression ends and human rights that were once willingly suppressed instead become guaranteed.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Ok but step 1 has been thoroughly explored and this administration didn’t delay their agenda for a second. Step 2 requires massive legal reform tandem with a functional judiciary, given that profit, capital, and power consolidation are what they seek. Unfortunately they’re winning that battle as the judiciary and legal system are only degrading despite public outcry.

        • s@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Oh yes, I am aware. The person I was replying to had implied that step 2 didn’t exist at all so I was making a more broad statement.

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Non violent protests might take time but it will give good results. Even against violent oppressors.

      Violent protests might feel direct, might show results immediately. But those might not be what you would like. Violence only begets violence.

      • untorquer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        watches protest footage “yeah that cop clearly shot the reporter from behind in self defense”

        … Among a billion other examples