Breath_Of_The_Snake [they/them, comrade/them]

  • 1 Post
  • 87 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 6th, 2024

help-circle
  • Totally agreed, but the anti-America pedant in me feels the need to point something out. That thing being that amerikkka pays lip service to the UN definition of WMD. America has a weapon in every category that the UN covers. Despite that, America falls back on him having chemical weapons. He did have those, ask Iran. That being said, America has them. Russia has them, and damn near every actually powerful nation has them. It’s a loose definition. Nobody gives a fuck about chlorine artillery shells, but it is generally agreed upon if we choose to use UN definition(which America fails on literally every count despite using as a cudgel) that those count as WMD.

    It’s not logical or consistently applied. It’s a weapon of the liberal rules based order against “upstarts”.

    He did have them, under a specific and hypocritical definition of having “not ok to use” weapons that are inaccurately called WMD. A radiation ray that only targets the pentagon would count as a WMD despite being specifically targeted. It’s a bogus premise hiding behind the general consensus that indiscriminate assault is bad (which it is, for the most part). The definition is flawed.



  • Edited TLDR: sometimes the human deserved the violence from the member of the other species.

    Modern society just uses civil law to coerce the animals owner into killing any animal (treated as property under the law) because of lawsuits. If there was a legit trial with public defenders and whatnot, a lot less innocent dogs would get killed.

    Witness: Yes your honor, little jimmy kicked the shit out of a passing by pug who then bit him.

    Public defender: as you can see it was self defense the dogs part and there was no crime.

    Reasonable jury: little jimmy is a little shit, the dog did nothing wrong.

    Without trials it goes like this:

    Shitty parent: your dog bit my precious angel! Put it down or I’ll sue.

    Not once does whether or not the animal was justified get taken into account.

    Ignore the dog brain, but most human with non-human under an humans care interactions that would go to trial apply to dogs. Try hard enough and you’ll find a parallel path for llamas or something.