Wholesome :)

Oh heck yeah, thank you! Curiosity finally satisfied. Neat intro innit!

lol

Brent was even pretty great in Enterprise no? As

Not sure about that one film though

Word censorship is ridiculous for sure

I mean is this the damn internet or not!

That said would kindly request a lil introspection on this comment

@nukeforyou2@lemmy.ml don’t tell anybody* but The Dude (admin) somehow keeps this place blazingly fast, super fast updates, the whole enchilada

99% renewable energy powered too apparently if you’re into that

Lazy linkin’ it just in case too sh.itjust.works/signup

*everybody excepted

heh

They say various words, and occasionally I web search a select portion of those words to learn what they’re upset about :)

Super super interesting when they give a left-ish leaning position “the last word”, makes me wonder if they aren’t 100% right wing (just 97% or something). (Or maybe the audience likes to scoff at the end of certain stories, no idea.) Grains and shakers always needed 🧂

CNN!

Nice, multiple episodes a day, all quick hits. Sometimes just what I’m looking for, tidbits from around the world. Maybe I want e.g. the BBC’s deep dive—30min a couple times a day from Global News Podcast—but other times only looking for a few minutes.

Thanks :)

Siri play Apple News

Nice, thanks! Hearing someone who might also be on NPR

Aww but least

Most multilayered podcast

Wait so the people who refuse to go with those big companies (aren’t there principled folks like that, maybe they have a name I’m forgetting) have to deal with that instead?

It was like people who have to pay some fee I thought… searches oh it’s the no broker fee people. So do no broker fee ppl often pay viewing fees? And viewing fees are legal?

Yes to oil and stove.

Totally forgot about the stove timer thanks!

Kinda live on too

Your local library will help or (US, national)

Library of Congress: ask.loc.gov

PieFed / @cypherpunks@lemmy.ml W

Ohhh great insight of theirs, very interesting!

Just thinking about it for a second I wonder if those same parents would’ve handed those same kids the same size toy. Maybe those kids did have equivalent size toys in the house in which case I would wonder if there was some kind of contextual “I eat chocolate, this toy was in chocolate” kind of issue.

Pure speculation so if neither of those points mattered then maybe I would unban as well.

typo edit: “hate” to “eat”

Agreed

Mind spoiling it for me?

▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒

“Well, I don’t know what I expected“

Only have to interpolate then!

Thanks for that. Wouldn’t have checked myself this time, so appreciate it.

Out of curiosity…

Would you personally keep the ban? (No one wants dead kids, but we do want kids to e.g. ride bikes even though at scale bicycle fatalities are essentially inevitable, making it an honest question I hope.)

“What did it cost” they say

Worth reading. Other Ds & Rs have debt. Also this…

Some high-profile candidates saddled with debt get creative.

Democrat Hillary Clinton, for one, paid down $22.5 million in campaign debt from her 2008 campaign through a multi-pronged approach that included selling leftover campaign trinkets, offering face time President Bill Clinton and renting the personal information of her campaign supporters to other Democrats and private data brokers. Clinton’s 2008 committee paid off its debts by 2013 — just in time for Clinton to announce another White House run in the 2016 election cycle.

(emphasis mine)