• 0 Posts
  • 71 Comments
Joined 5 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 14th, 2025

help-circle
  • Like ten years back, in a Finnish abandoned soap factory turned into hackerspace, I jokingly asked if I can pay by card for something silly. My jaw almost dropped as this private individual whips out a legit card reader and says yes. The devices are somewhat common now but that was my first interaction with it

    Idk what hoops they’d require you to jump through, maybe you need to be incorporated depending on the country or so, but I’d not be too surprised if they start supporting this sooner or later

    Think I’ve also heard about proposals or trials to transfer from phone to phone. What will be hard to not sound like a lie is that I don’t have any sort of banking app on my phone… The future is bright ^^


  • Looking at other comments, clearly I’m in the minority that I simply feel watched when there’s a camera that I know is aimed at me right now. I can’t know if someone’s watching, or watching it back later. I’m not doing anything nefarious, not more than picking my nose perhaps, but it’s not like everyone’s given a feed of all cameras that exist either. Clearly people don’t want to just be watched insofar as it is avoidable

    Most of the time I don’t know that a camera is filming me and ignorance is bliss. And obviously facial recognition and license plate scanning, as mentioned in other comments, goes even further. But I’m also simply not super happy with the ubiquity of cameras on every street and every publicly accessible place and vehicle you use, even if I see their benefits as well



  • Publicly-funded media is great and all, but that’s because its bias is obvious and upfront, not because it is unbiased.

    And here I again wonder where your from to have such a mindset

    These people aren’t politicians…

    a “centrist” bias where multiple extremes are presented as being equally valid.

    You’ve not seen Dutch news. They don’t talk about hate speech as an equally valid option to our constitution the way that you’d expect with the current voting patterns and government composition if your statement were true. This uninformed opinion on what news can and must be, without having seen anything but english-cultural standards it sounds like, is what I mean…


  • I’d be curious what country/ies the downvoters are from. This is also how I see it but nobody online ever agrees. I suspect it’s a culture thing: most people online aren’t from the Netherlands and I can’t say if this type of news also exists abroad (Tagesschau seems okay but I haven’t looked at it in detail or talked with enough germans about it to say that with any confidence whatsoever, and I’ve got even less info on other countries)

    In NL we of course also have some loonies who call the general news channels leftist propaganda, but overall I don’t have the impression that places like NOS spin things one way or another. It’s also government-funded which, going by the banners google now shows on publicly-funded youtube channels, probably means American readers of this message think I’m completely brainwashed by my government? Who knows, but then I’d be curious to hear what types of things they ever represented counterfactually








  • Luc@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world[deleted]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Not fully, no. My understanding is that the available data of countries with and without general-citizen gun ownership, all else being equal, shows that normal issues (crime, personal conflicts, …) becomes gun-involved issues a lot more frequently so apparently it does help


  • Luc@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world[deleted]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Fwiw, there’s knives and there’s knives. What you describe is a category that’s afaik generally allowed. What’s not is the kind that extends with the push of a button (spring loaded, as I understand it; I’m not a weapons person). Opening it from the state you carry in need to be a two-handed process, presumably to make it less accessible to go for as well as giving the would-be victim a second to get the hell out of there or call for help or whatnot



  • Used to be 5km where I grew up in the Netherlands, nowadays living in Germany it’s 1km but uphill (don’t have those in NL!). In either case I don’t want to walk it and there’s not a chance I would if it’s 30 degrees out: that temperature means it’s probably in a month of the year where I burn within 10-20 minutes. I’d have to put on sunscreen for going to the store! They better have a sandy beach aisle





  • Luc@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world[deleted]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would expect that judges have a fine moral compass for which crimes are worse than others. Better if they don’t need to follow some administration’s counterscientific “tough on crime” whim

    You make a compelling case for maximums though. I hadn’t thought of it as being a way to reduce torture or death penalty in the countries where that’s on the table in the first place


  • Luc@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world[deleted]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Then the prosecution brings case law where a person of color in a similar situation got a very different sentence, or someone without the rich parents etc.

    I’m sure there’ll be biases but minimum sentences won’t undo those. I’d find minimum and maximum sentences very unfair for situations like described by the person you replied to. Case law and perhaps a blinding system (Justice is blindfolded after all) where at least one of the judges involved doesn’t get to learn things like “white guy with rich parents” might be a better solution if that’s the problem this is intended to solve