

No, Krafton’s explanation was clearer and plainer spoken.
Krafton may be lying or misrepresenting the situation, but their explanation is both simple and believable, if not necessarily the truth.
No, Krafton’s explanation was clearer and plainer spoken.
Krafton may be lying or misrepresenting the situation, but their explanation is both simple and believable, if not necessarily the truth.
deleted by creator
I agree, but you can be right all by yourself and make no impact on the world if you can’t effectively communicate why you’re right.
And you were wrong about that! See how bad at making a coherent argument you are?
Wanna drop your CPR certification to prove me wrong? Maybe that you’re a karate black belt? A notary?
Yeah, this author is the pop-sci / sci-fi media writer on Ars Technica, not one of the actual science coverage ones that stick to their area of expertise, and you can tell by the overly broad, click bait, headline, that is not actually supported by the research at hand.
The actual research is using limited LLM agents and only explores an incredibly limited number of interventions. This research does not remotely come close to supporting the question of whether or not social media can be fixed, which in itself is a different question from harm reduction.
I have a PhD, I work at a university.
Oh well that certainly explains the condescension and the poor communication skills.
Here’s a hint, if your argument starts with credential dropping, try again. It’s a badly reasoned argument if it needs a stamp to make it seem legit.
I mean, no you don’t given that they’re being used in virtually every call centre and help desk these days.
We do not live in a post truth world, and making up random stories in your head based on nothing is not any form of truth.
The GDPR is good and has absolutely changed how things are done. I’ve been involved with multiple companies having to change their European data practices because of it.
I don’t know why you have so little faith in the EU when it’s an actually functioning government that is passing new consumer protection legislation.
The problem with Brexit not the lack of clarity, it was that it was a fundamentally dumb idea motivated but dumbness.
It was a bunch of people who blamed every problem on the EU for no sound reason and thus they supported a self harming policy.
This is a situation where the policy is fundamentally sound, it just needs some clarity around implementation details. This is literally how government is supposed to work.
The way we bought it just requires the server code to be available to run, if does not require any specific company running servers. And running servers is not a suable offense.
Fair, then I agree, I just wouldn’t really describe a realistically achievable end result as “smashing”.
Yeah, the three fired heads owned 90% of the shares, so they got $225M from the initial sale, and were due to get another $225M from the bonuses. That’s why Krafton still paid out $25M in bonuses after the uproar.
I mean their codebase more generally.
I disagree that it is impossible. It just takes moral clarity on our part to always question and dispute the conflation of Israel with Jews.
I think that expecting to get to a population with 100% moral clarity is impossible. I honestly don’t see how it possibly could be when mental health problems, people with extremely low intelligence, and people who have suffered extreme pain and abuse all exist. I certainly don’t think it’s possible to achieve within a generation or probably even within 2, even if Israel was to stop committing crimes against humanity now.
“smashing antisemitism in Canada […] part of our pro-Palestine solidarity praxis”
Fair enough, I do still agree that it is a goal worth pursuing. I don’t think it will make Israel or Israelis think any differently, but it will give at least give them fewer excuses to hide behind.
Yeah I agree, but Israel makes “smashing anti-semitism” impossible.
As long as Israel is committing genocide, there will be people who deeply hate Israel. Since Israel drafts every citizen into its military, it ends up making all Israelis complicit in the eyes of the outraged. And since Israel associates itself heavily with the Jewish religion, inevitably someone with a poor grip on reality or understanding of the world will end up being anti-Semitic more generally.
Ending anti-Semitism is still a goal worth pursuing, but it will not come remotely close to being achieved until Israel stops the slaughter of Palestinians for generations, long enough for the wounds to heal or those carrying them to die.
Krafton has claimed they asked for 30% more content for the early access version, which isn’t that minimal.
Subnautica isn’t just a survival game, but a story driven game as well, and given how janky their engine was, it’s not a surprise that they’d want to overhaul it from the ground up.
I genuinely don’t know what about your comment is supposed to be mocking.
You’re just describing the situation presented in purposefully more confusing language than the article.
What’s your gripe with more than three windows?
Window management is usually not a complaint of Windows…