• Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    “Oh no, a platform with options, why would anyone want options?”

    Go buy a MacBook if you like basic functions. Yt music is getting closer to old fashioned but amazing Winamp. I praise them for it. With one menu button you have all the options 1 click away. No submenu’s, no 5 different menu’s, just one with everything. How can you complain about this? I’d say that’s mild infuriating. “oh look, a platform is doing something right, let’s make fun of them because I just wat a play and pause function and nothing more.”

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Don’t think OP is complaining about the number of options so much as how they are presented.

      That menu looks much taller than it needs to be, the spacing between lines is huge, and the icons are unnecessarily big too.

      Might not be what OP meant, but that’s how I read it.

      EDIT - upon reading down the thread, it looks like it IS the number of options, my bad, sorry.

      • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        The size of the menu makes it easy to recognize (with the icons) to find the option you want. The small windows menus can be really long and always makes you read half of it to find the one you need. The only option I would like to see added (as stated by someone else here in the comments) is the “stop after current song”.

        • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          I guess it’s a matter of taste - I find a menu that tall, with gaps that large between the items, harder to read than a more compact presentation of the same info.

          Either way though, it doesn’t seem like that was the issue, so not to worry!

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      I’m also appreciating how easy it is to navigate given the context. It has everything you need to find what you want at a glance: good spacing, clear icons, and sorted in the order I’d most likely expect. It could use a couple separators, though, or maybe extend the layout to two columns like a start menu.

      I don’t see the problem besides the jump scare of expecting a smaller menu.

  • Seefra 1@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 days ago

    And they are still missing the most important menu item “Stop after this track”

  • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Shut up. Seriously. If any frontend designer hears you, the next thing you know is that you need to click through 4 submenus just to skip a song ‘bEcAuSe UsErS gEt CoNfUsEd WhEn ThEy SeE tOo MaNy OpTiOnS’

    • lemmyknow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      Well, I’ve studied human-machine interaction and indeed too many options can affect a user’s interaction with the program. Don’t seem to recall the exact numbers, but there is a range to the optimal number of options in a menu. 5 to 7 options, maybe? Too many options, iirc, increase the time they take to process the options, even in menus they might be familiar with.

      Not ideal: one huge menu with all options inside.

      Also not ideal: too many small submenus.

      Find a balance. Not all vertical, but also not all horizontal, nested menus

      If I find the material, I’ll update the comment.

      Edit: Hick’s Law

      Edit 2: 8 is the limit for pie menus. Otherwise, options get too small.

      Width is preferred over depth in cascading menus. I think it’s about 15 to 20 options per menu

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I disagree. Who needs a special item called “Stats for Nerds” hanging in there? Nerds know how to enable them in the app settings.

      What really bugs me about this menu is that they keep rearranging the items and I need to search where the hell “Save to Playlist” went again. And I often confuse “Save to Library” and “Save to Playlist”, because isn’t that like the same thing, but called different?

      YouTube Music’s UI is getting increasingly messy and frustrating.

        • lemmyknow@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          YES! But only if they gimme back the songs and albums I’ve purchased for 0 monies back in the day. Had them as files on my pc, but lost them in poor last minute backups prior to reinstall. Had some big names, full albums, for free, in my collection

      • snooggums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 days ago

        What really bugs me about this menu is that they keep rearranging the items and I need to search where the hell “Save to Playlist” went again. And I often confuse “Save to Library” and “Save to Playlist”, because isn’t that like the same thing, but called different?

        Rearranging is an issue.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hard disagree.

      There’s at least a handful of items there that can be tucked away and wouldn’t be missed 99% of the time. The rest can be split in two groups without requiring additional clicks and cutting down time.

      I loathe when I need to go through a dozen things in a menu because no one bothered to establish a relevance criteria, and I’m not even dsylxeic

  • DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    This is the opposite of infuriating. Do you know what is? Having to poke around all four corners and then scroll down to figure out where the latest update moved the shit I’m looking for. This isn’t very clean I’ll give you that. But it’s still 1000% better than buttons all over the place.

    • starlinguk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      And then it will be somewhere completely illogical. Like, the theme settings are under ‘privacy’ or some such nonsense.

    • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      They keep adding and rearranging the menu items though, so I still have to look where they put the shit I’m looking for again. Not as annoying as burying the stuff behind a thousand dropdowns, but…mildly infuriating. :D

      • DeceasedPassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        7 days ago

        Alright you make fair points. Easier than multiple menus but yeah, why the hell do they keep rearranging? It feels like an engagement mechanism to make you spend just a second longer on the page or accidentally click something else due to muscle memory.

  • Stovetop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Definitely ways they could make that cleaner.

    • Remove from queue: have this as an option only from the queue itself, not from the song currently playing.

    • Go to: merge into a single “Go to…” button, press it for a submenu listing Artist/Album/Song Info

    • Report: Useless. Vet your own shit, Google.

    • Pin to Listen Again: Just use “liked songs” like a sane person.

    • Dismiss queue: same as remove from queue.

    • Stats for nerds: should only be visible with an advanced or developer option in the app settings.

  • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    wrong

    that’s what the menu is for, showing us the other options

    I don’t want to have to dig for something that should just be in the menu